I’ve written a number of articles about scientists and medical medical doctors who query the official narrative in regards to the COVID-19 pandemic and the global measures put into place due to it, from ineffective testing, mask wearing and social distancing, to lockdowns, tracking and tracing and the baseless fearmongering driving all of it.

Within the video above, British journalist Anna Brees interviews Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech firm Ziarco, now owned by Novartis.

In it, he discusses a number of considerations, together with his perception that widespread PCR testing is creating the false concept that the pandemic is resurging, as the whole mortality price is totally regular. He additionally discusses his considerations about COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

PCR Testing Is Inflicting a False ‘Casedemic’

As I defined in “Asymptomatic ‘Casedemic’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear,” through the use of PCR testing, which can’t diagnose energetic an infection, a false narrative has been created.

At present, rising “circumstances,” which means optimistic assessments, are once more getting used because the justification to impose extra extreme restrictions, together with lockdowns and necessary masks sporting, when in actual fact optimistic assessments don’t have anything to do with the precise unfold of sickness.

In accordance with Yeadon, the U.Okay. has now examined an estimated 30 million folks, or near half of the inhabitants. “A big variety of these assessments have been current,” Yeadon says, noting that the definition of a “coronavirus dying” within the U.Okay. is anybody who dies, from any trigger, inside 28 days of a optimistic COVID-19 check.

So, what we’re seeing now could be a pure dying price — about 1,700 folks die every day within the U.Okay. in any given 12 months, Yeadon says — however many of those deaths at the moment are falsely attributed to COVID-19. “I am calling out the statistics, and even the declare that there’s an ongoing pandemic, as false,” he says.

He challenges anybody who does not consider him to search out any database on complete mortality. If you happen to do this, you will see that the each day dying depend is “completely bang-on regular,” Yeadon says.

For some months, the dying depend is definitely barely decrease than the typical norm over the previous 5 years. And, he provides, “You can not have a deadly pandemic stalking the land and never have extra deaths.”

Lack of Routine Medical Care Is Inflicting Uptick in Deaths

The slight uptick in deaths that at the moment are being reported merely aren’t immediately as a result of COVID-19, he insists. Information present these deaths — primarily folks aged 45 to 65, with equal distribution between the sexes — are primarily from coronary heart illness, stroke and most cancers, which suggests they are extra deaths attributable to inaccessibility of routine medical care as folks are both afraid or discouraged from going to the hospital.

These deaths could also be characterised as being COVID associated, however that is solely as a result of they’ve been falsely lumped into that class as a result of false positives being recorded inside 28 days of dying.

Once more, persons are being examined very recurrently, and the speed of false positives is extraordinarily excessive. All hospital sufferers are additionally examined upon admission, so after they die — whatever the trigger — they’re more likely to have a false optimistic on their document, which then lumps them into the dying tally for COVID-19.

“The longer you keep in hospital, the extra seemingly you might be to die, clearly,” Yeadon says. “You’d be launched for those who have been effectively and enhancing. So … long-stay sufferers are each extra more likely to die statistically, and far more more likely to be examined so usually that they’re going to have a false optimistic check.

That’s what I feel is going on … It is a comfort for somebody enjoying some macabre recreation, as a result of I do not assume it is an error anymore … I’ve spoken to folks in [public health] and so they’re embarrassed that they don’t seem to be even being allowed to characterize and publish the knowledge you would wish to know to work out how helpful the check is. That is not being accomplished.”

Can You Get Reinfected?

Yeadon additionally says he is “sick and drained” of individuals claiming that immunity in opposition to SARS-CoV-2 could wane after a short while, leaving you weak to reinfection. If you happen to’ve been ailing with COVID-19 and get better, you’ll have antibodies in opposition to the virus, and you may be immune, he says.

He understands that journalists could get this incorrect, or could also be given incorrect data, but when a scientist says this, “they’re mendacity to you,” he says. Yeadon categorically denies the premise that you’ll be able to get better from COVID-19 and later get reinfected and expertise extreme sickness once more.

In accordance with Yeadon, there are solely two methods by which COVID-19 wouldn’t present lasting immunity. The primary could be if it destroys your immune system. The HIV virus, for instance, which causes AIDS, disarms your immune system, inflicting everlasting impairment. Therefore you don’t turn out to be resistant to the HIV virus. Coronaviruses don’t do this.

The second means is that if the virus mutates, which is frequent amongst influenza viruses. If the virus mutates, your immune system could not totally acknowledge it and must mount a protection once more, thereby creating one other set of antibodies. Nevertheless, coronaviruses are genetically secure, Yeadon says.

(For transparency, there have been studies of SARS-CoV-2 mutating,1 so it is not unattainable that some folks may get reinfected with a barely mutated model of the virus which may make them sick once more.) 

Hidden Agenda in Plain Sight

As famous by Yeadon, folks at the moment are altering the legal guidelines of immunology, which merely should not occur. This shouldn’t be a political concern, however someway it’s being handled as one. He claims to haven’t any concepts in any respect as to why these false narratives are being created, and why scientific fact that contradicts the mainstream narrative is being censored.

Others, nonetheless, have turn out to be extra outspoken about this concern, declaring how the pandemic is getting used as a handy excuse and justification for redistribution of wealth and the technocratic takeover of the entire world below the banner of a Great Reset to a “extra equitable” social order and greener commerce.

It is getting used to usher in social adjustments that merely might by no means be launched with out some form of calamity, be it warfare or a organic menace, as a result of they contain a radical limitation of private freedoms and the elimination of privateness. These in control of pandemic response measures additionally refuse to bear in mind the worth of those measures.

When making public well being choices, you’ll want to calculate the associated fee when it comes to lives saved and the worth in {dollars} and cents of saving these folks, in opposition to the price of not implementing the measure in query. This isn’t being accomplished. The query is why is such an illogical stance being taken?

Yeadon on Vaccination

Towards the top of the interview, Yeadon addresses the problem of COVID-19 vaccination. Many are nervous about it turning into necessary, and rightfully so. Vaccine passports are already being rolled out, and all the indications level to vaccination turning into a requirement for journey, maybe even inside nationwide borders.

Having spent his profession within the pharmaceutical trade, Yeadon totally helps vaccination, believing they forestall massive numbers of deaths. Nevertheless, with regards to SARS-CoV-2, he believes the vaccine will solely profit the aged. For these over 80, a vaccine may give them a few extra months of life.

“No person else wants this [vaccine],” he says. “You do not vaccinate a inhabitants as a result of 1 in 1 million may need a nasty consequence [from the infection].” He additionally strongly believes the vaccine should be voluntary:

It is an appalling … public platform to counsel that the one means we get our lives again is to mass vaccinate the inhabitants. One thing very smelly is occurring. It is merely not acceptable. I do not even assume it could work.”

In an open letter to the British well being minister, Yeadon wrote:2

I’ve learn the session doc. I’ve not often been as shocked and upset. All vaccines in opposition to the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in growth for various months. If any such vaccine is permitted to be used below any circumstances that aren’t EXPLICITLY experimental, I consider that recipients are being misled to a legal extent.

That is as a result of there are exactly zero human volunteers for whom there might probably be various months past-dose security data. My concern doesn’t come up as a result of I’ve unfavorable views about vaccines (I do not).

As a substitute, it is the very precept that politicians appear able to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of growth, shouldn’t be made accessible to topics on something apart from an explicitly experimental foundation. That is my concern.

And the motive for that concern is that it’s not identified what the security profile will be, six months or a 12 months or longer after dosing. You might have actually no information on this and neither does anybody else.

It is not that I am saying that unacceptable hostile results will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it’s that you haven’t any concept what is going to occur but, regardless of this, you may be creating the impression that you simply do …

do not belief you. You have not been easy and have behaved appallingly all through this disaster. You are still doing it now, deceptive about an infection threat from younger kids. Why ought to I consider you in relation to experimental vaccines?”

What Can You Do?

In his interview with Brees, Yeadon suggests medical professionals, particularly those that are members of an expert society, who disagree with additional pandemic measures — primarily based on the medical info — write an open letter to the federal government, urging them to talk to and heed the suggestions from impartial consultants.

Arm your self with mortality statistics and the info on PCR testing, so you’ll be able to clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore. At the start, there are not any extra deaths. The identical variety of folks have died this 12 months that, on common, have died in earlier years. This merely would not be the case if we had a deadly pandemic.

Second, the PCR check will not be a legitimate diagnostic software and shouldn’t be accomplished on the dimensions we’re now doing it. The excessive price of false positives is barely fodder for pointless fearmongering. “Individuals ought to demand to know what [the false positive] price is,” Yeadon says.

Moreover, “testing people who find themselves effectively — it is only a madcap factor,” he says. Nearly nobody who’s asymptomatic has the dwell virus, however once you run the check at a cycle threshold over 30, which means you amplify the viral RNA greater than 30 instances, you find yourself with a optimistic check even when the virus is inactive and noninfectious.

“Let’s get again to the info,” Yeadon says. “There are not any extra deaths. However that is not what you hear from the BBC now, is it? I am by no means going to belief the BBC once more, by the best way. I’ve watched BBC for 41 years. [They’re] by no means coming again into my ears, as a result of they’ve lied in my face all 12 months … There is a fraud occurring …

You are strolling into voluntary home arrest when there are not any extra deaths. Why are you doing that? Severely? … I am fearful, as a result of it does not make any sense and there are not any benign outcomes.”

Get Organized

It is easy to get so confused that you may no longer assume straight as of late. As defined by Dr. Peter Breggin, featured in “Psychiatrist Blows the Whistle on Pandemic Fearmongering,” once you add uncertainty to worry you find yourself with nervousness, a state through which you can now not assume logically.

If this is applicable to you, I urge you to show off mainstream media information and switch to impartial consultants, equivalent to Yeadon. Do the analysis. Learn by the science. Reorient your self to the info and switch off the propaganda. Subsequent, be part of a gaggle as a way to have help.

A variety of teams have fashioned all over the world that at the moment are rising up in opposition to masks mandates, necessary vaccinations and lockdowns. A couple of examples of such teams embody:

  • Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening faculties and defending kids’s rights within the U.Okay.
  • Keep Britain Free
  • The COVID Restoration Group (CRG), based by 50 conservative British MPs to combat lockdown restrictions3
  • Within the U.S., a crew of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise homeowners and fogeys began the Freedom to Breathe Agency, which is combating to guard freedom and liberty

Further sources of data and teams combating for fact and transparency which might be value testing embody:

  • The Great Barrington Declaration,4 which requires an finish to lockdowns. As of November 18, 2020, it had been signed by 34,973 medical practitioners, 12,070 medical and public well being scientists, and 634,838 involved residents5
  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s The Defender, a brand new publication that publishes “banned” information
  • The German COVID-19 Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (ACU2020.org), which is launching a world class-action lawsuit in opposition to an extended listing of authorities over the worldwide pandemic response
  • In Spain, greater than 600 medical doctors have fashioned Medical doctors for the Reality (Medicos por la verdad)
  • Within the U.S., medical doctors have fashioned a gaggle known as America’s Frontline Doctors, which is combating to make hydroxychloroquine accessible throughout the nation


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here