However, not like the primary model of the invoice, which handed the Home in March 2019 and predictably went nowhere within the Republican-controlled Senate, it additionally contains key provisions that may construct on the success of widespread vote by mail within the 2020 election. It might make no-excuse absentee voting a nationwide proper, permitting each American to vote by mail while not having to supply a motive, as some states nonetheless require. It might prohibit states from making voters get their mail ballots co-signed or notarized, eradicating an pointless barrier that makes it harder to vote from dwelling. It might mandate that each county have a ample variety of drop containers the place voters can return their filled-out ballots. It might have the federal authorities pre-pay all postage on absentee ballots, eliminating yet one more barrier to mail voting: value. It might require that states permit voters to ship mail ballots at polling stations. And it will bar states from enacting voter ID necessities to request a mail poll, which Republicans in Georgia and Texas are actually pushing for.

Collectively, these measures would enhance the voting course of in numerous methods—for example, by eliminating the uncertainty that voters and elections confronted final fall whereas native legal guidelines had been litigated, and necessities modified day-to-day. H.R.1 additionally has a few of the greatest mechanisms to “forestall Republicans from dismantling voting rights and voting entry underneath the guise of safety, all in response to allegations of voter fraud that they themselves fabricated,” mentioned Tammy Patrick, former commissioner on Obama’s Presidential Fee on Election Administration. […]






“One of many qualities of liberty is that, so long as it’s being striven after, it goes on increasing. Subsequently, the person who stands within the midst of the battle and says, ‘I’ve it’, merely exhibits by doing in order that he has simply misplaced it.”  ~~Henrik Ibsen (1871)


On this date at Each day Kos in 2010—Right this moment’s “do not ask, do not inform” listening to:

In what Carl Levin (D-MI) described as a “profile in management,” right this moment Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Workers Mike Mullen gave a stirring private assertion in assist of repealing the navy’s “do not ask, do not inform” coverage

However as anticipated, throughout the Senate Armed Providers Committee listening to, Protection Secretary Gates and Mullen introduced that the Pentagon would start a yearlong research to find out easy methods to finish the navy’s discriminatory “do not ask, do not inform” coverage.

And on the identical time, a number of Republican opposition themes emerged: we won’t do that whereas we’re in the course of two wars, they perceive that the witnesses are simply following orders from their Leftist-in-Chief, or that Gates and Mullen are biased and can exert undue affect on their subordinates to get the outcomes they need. Take your decide.

So, why will it take a yr of evaluations, research and surveys to resolve that saying “none of your damned enterprise” is the one coverage they want? 


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here