Whereas Teets was off obligation on the time of the incident, Schuetz was not. Beaverton police Sgt. Kevin MacDonald mentioned by failing to arrest Teets, Schuetz “prevented the investigation from occurring.” On account of the incident that “terrorized” a household, Teets was later charged with second-degree legal mischief and second-degree disorderly conduct. Forest Grove police officers then requested the Beaverton Police Division to research Schuetz’s involvement in November.
Whereas Teets was positioned on administrative desk obligation throughout investigations, Schuetz is presently on paid administrative go away—regardless of being indicted on legal expenses, based on Forest Grove Police officers. The investigations proceed per a lawsuit filed by Mirella Castaneda, one of many dwelling’s residents, who believes that her home was focused “due to her private and political views.” When reached for a remark concerning the arrests, Castaneda famous that the arrest itself doesn’t resolve the problem at hand.
“I’m glad that individuals are lastly asking the questions that have to be requested,” Castaneda advised the Portland Tribune. “Hopefully which means folks care sufficient to understand how their regulation enforcement departments are literally conducting enterprise, and ensuring that they’re doing it the fitting method.”
In keeping with the Portland Tribune, Teets was reported to be “extremely intoxicated” throughout the Oct. 31 incident and the responding officer didn’t activate their body-worn digicam regardless of division coverage. In keeping with a Washington County Sheriff’s Workplace memo, Teets didn’t even acknowledge his colleagues and “squared up” in a combating stance when first approached by them. Investigations solely started after the incident was reported to a supervisor by one other officer on name.
In keeping with Castaneda’s lawsuit, responding officers didn’t even examine Teets for weapons. She wasn’t even advised Teets was a police officer, The Washington Post reported. It was solely when she googled his identify that she realized the person who harassed her household was a police officer close by. Her attorneys argue that this ignorance, the failure to doc attainable political motives, and the officers’ unwillingness to activate physique cameras have to be investigated.
“The remedy of Ms. Castaneda as a second-class citizen primarily based on her political viewpoint by the investigating officers added insult to harm, and additional compounded the emotional trauma she and her household had skilled by the hands of Officer Teets,” her lawyer mentioned.
Whereas Castaneda has not gotten the solutions she wants, she hopes that higher coverage, actions, and procedures will comply with this case.
“Hopefully justice is served on this case, however greater than something, I hope it is a likelihood for the police to be extra clear sooner or later,” Castaneda advised the Portland Tribune. “Transparency and accountability is absolutely what folks need from their police division.”
The case itself has raised questions on how the remedy of regulation enforcement officers differs from civilians in legal instances. The truth that an off-duty officer was pushed dwelling as a substitute of to the police division after harassing a household is past understanding. Teets’ actions weren’t solely inappropriate as an officer, however as a human usually. Had the flag represented one thing else, the scenario may need been completely different. Sadly, such incidents involving the Black Lives Matter flag are far too frequent. In multiple incidents, people have focused houses and harassed households outdoors of which the flag has been displayed. These people have confronted expenses starting from hate crimes to legal expenses. Cops mustn’t stroll free or be given particular remedy for terrorizing a household or caving in to their fragile egos triggered by actions to carry them accountable.