Within the final 12 months, have you ever ever felt that you just’re dwelling in an altered sense of actuality, the place stuff you as soon as knew to be true not are? It is not in your creativeness. In recent times and months, the long-held definitions of three phrases all modified, with immense ramifications for public well being coverage within the midst of COVID-19.

The even higher implication for society is that by placing out this false data, they’re trying to vary your notion of what is true and never true, and perverting science within the course of.

WHO Modified the Definition of Pandemic

What precisely is a pandemic? WHO’s authentic definition of a pandemic from Could 1, 2009, specified simultaneous epidemics worldwide “with huge numbers of deaths and diseases:”1,2

“An influenza pandemic happens when a brand new influenza virus seems in opposition to which the human inhabitants has no immunity, leading to a number of, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with huge numbers of deaths and sickness.”

This definition was modified within the month main as much as the 2009 swine flu pandemic, eradicating the severity and excessive mortality standards and leaving the definition of a pandemic as “a worldwide epidemic of a illness.”3

This change in definition allowed WHO to declare swine flu a pandemic after solely 144 individuals had died from the an infection worldwide, and it is why COVID-19 continues to be promoted as a pandemic despite the fact that loads of knowledge counsel the lethality of COVID-19 is on par with the seasonal flu.4

Vaccine Definition Modified

By referring to COVID-19 vaccines as “vaccines” slightly than gene therapies, the U.S. authorities is violating its 15 U.S. Code Part 41,5 which regulates misleading practices in medical claims. Per this legislation, it’s illegal to promote:6

“… {that a} services or products can stop, deal with, or treatment human illness until you possess competent and dependable scientific proof, together with, when acceptable, well-controlled human scientific research, substantiating that the claims are true on the time they’re made.”

Additional, you can’t have a “vaccine” that doesn’t meet the definition of a vaccine. Up till not too long ago, Merriam-Webster outlined a vaccine as “a preparation of killed microorganisms, dwelling attenuated organisms or dwelling totally virulent organisms that’s administered to provide or artificially improve immunity to a selected illness.”7

COVID-19 vaccines aren’t typical vaccines made with dwell or attenuated viruses. They’re truly gene therapies. The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are made with lipid nanoparticles that include polyethylene glycol (PEG)8 and messenger RNA (mRNA).

mRNA are snippets of genetic code that carries directions for cells to provide proteins. The definition of genetic is “regarding genes” and genes include educational code that inform the physique what proteins to make. Remedy is the medical therapy of illness, so mRNA vaccines are very clearly gene remedy.

As famous by David Martin, Ph.D., Moderna’s SEC filings9 specify and stress that the FDA considers its know-how a “gene therapy technology,” initially supposed for most cancers therapy. Its mechanism of motion additionally confirms it to be gene remedy. The mRNA gene therapies at present being misleadingly marketed as “vaccines” flip your cells into bioreactors that churn out viral proteins to incite an immune response, and there isn’t any off-switch.10

Conveniently, since COVID-19 “vaccines” didn’t meet the previous definition of vaccine, Merriam-Webster’s vaccine definition has not too long ago been modified to incorporate an outline of the experimental COVID-19 gene therapies:11

“A preparation that’s administered (as by injection) to stimulate the physique’s immune response in opposition to a selected infectious illness:

a: an antigenic preparation of a usually inactivated or attenuated (see attenuated sense 2) pathogenic agent (reminiscent of a bacterium or virus) or considered one of its parts or merchandise (reminiscent of a protein or toxin)

b: a preparation of genetic materials (reminiscent of a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that’s utilized by the cells of the physique to provide an antigenic substance (reminiscent of a fraction of virus spike protein)”

Why They Do not Need COVID Vaccines To Be Known as Gene Remedy

Moderna’s SEC filings, which, within the video above, Martin claims to have rigorously reviewed, specify and stress that its know-how is a “gene remedy know-how.” Initially, its know-how was set as much as be a most cancers therapy so, extra particularly, it is a chemotherapy gene remedy know-how.

As famous by Martin, who would increase their hand to obtain prophylactic chemotherapy gene remedy for a most cancers you should not have and will by no means be in danger for? In all chance, few would leap at such a suggestion, and for good motive.

States and employers wouldn’t be capable of mandate people to obtain chemotherapy gene remedy for a most cancers they don’t have, because it merely wouldn’t be authorized.

But, they’re proposing that every one of humanity be pressured to get gene remedy for COVID-19. If they really known as it what it’s, particularly “gene remedy chemotherapy,” most individuals would — properly — refuse to take it. Maybe that is one motive for his or her false categorization as vaccines.

However there could also be different causes as effectively. Martin strays into conjecture, as we’ve got no proof of their intentions, however he speculates that the explanation they’re calling this experimental gene remedy know-how a “vaccine” is as a result of by doing so, they’ll circumvent legal responsibility for damages.

So long as the U.S. is underneath a state of emergency, issues like PCR assessments and COVID-19 “vaccines” are allowed underneath emergency use authorization. And, so long as the emergency use authorization is in impact, the makers of those experimental gene therapies aren’t financially chargeable for any hurt that comes from their use.

That’s, supplied they’re “vaccines.” If these injections are NOT vaccines, then the legal responsibility protect falls away, as a result of there is no such thing as a legal responsibility protect for a medical emergency countermeasure that’s gene remedy.

WHO Modified Definition of Herd Immunity

In June 2020, WHO’s definition of herd immunity, posted on considered one of their COVID-19 Q&A pages, was consistent with the broadly accepted idea that has been the usual for infectious ailments for many years. Here is what it initially stated, courtesy of the Internet Archive’s Wayback machine:12

“Herd immunity is the oblique safety from an infectious illness that occurs when a inhabitants is immune both by means of vaccination or immunity developed by means of earlier an infection.”

It needs to be famous that “immunity developed by means of earlier an infection” is the best way it has labored since people have been alive. Your immune system isn’t designed to get vaccines. It is designed to work in response to publicity to an infectious agent. Apparently, in keeping with WHO, that is not the case. In October 2020, here is their updated definition of herd immunity, which is now “an idea used for vaccination”:13

“‘Herd immunity’, also called ‘inhabitants immunity’, is an idea used for vaccination, wherein a inhabitants may be protected against a sure virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached. Herd immunity is achieved by defending individuals from a virus, not by exposing them to it.

Vaccines prepare our immune techniques to create proteins that battle illness, generally known as ‘antibodies’, simply as would occur once we are uncovered to a illness however – crucially – vaccines work with out making us sick. Vaccinated persons are protected against getting the illness in query and passing it on, breaking any chains of transmission.”

On Twitter, analysis analyst Heather Taylor posted a screenshot with the 2 definitions — one from June 9, 2020, and the opposite from November 13, 2020 — clearly modified to indicate that herd immunity, over the course of a number of months, all of the sudden grew to become an idea that solely applies to vaccination. “This nonetheless astounds me,” she wrote.14 Certainly, it is a blatant corruption of science.

In a 2020 JAMA Affected person Web page on herd immunity, Dr. Angel Desai, affiliate editor of JAMA Community Open, and Maimuna Majumder, Ph.D., with Boston Kids’s Hospital, Harvard Medical Faculty, clearly clarify that herd immunity could also be achieved through natural infection and restoration, as has all the time been the case:15

“Herd immunity could also be achieved both by means of an infection and restoration or by vaccination … Reaching herd immunity by means of an infection depends on sufficient individuals being contaminated with the illness and recovering from it, throughout which they develop antibodies in opposition to future an infection.”

WHO’s Recommendation Flip-Flops Typically

You might keep in mind that within the early days of the pandemic, face masks weren’t really useful for most people. In February 2020, Christine Francis, a marketing consultant for an infection prevention and management at WHO headquarters, was featured in a video, holding up a disposable face masks.

She stated, “Medical masks like this one can’t shield in opposition to the brand new coronavirus when used alone … WHO solely recommends the usage of masks in particular circumstances.”16

These particular circumstances embrace when you have a cough, fever or problem respiration. In different phrases, should you’re actively sick and displaying signs. “In case you should not have these signs, you should not have to put on masks as a result of there is no such thing as a proof that they shield people who find themselves not sick,” she continued.

In March 2020, the U.S. Surgeon Normal publicly agreed, tweeting a message stating, “Severely people- STOP BUYING MASKS!” and happening to say that they aren’t efficient in stopping most people from catching coronavirus.17

As of March 31, 2020, WHO was nonetheless advising in opposition to the usage of face masks for individuals with out signs, stating that there’s “no proof” that such masks utilization prevents COVID-19 transmission.18

By June 6, 2020, the rhetoric had modified. Citing “evolving proof,” WHO reversed their advice, with Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO’s director basic, advising governments to encourage most people to put on masks the place there’s widespread transmission and bodily distancing is tough.19

One other instance of WHO conveniently altering former truths to suit their agenda occurred in June 2020. Throughout a press briefing, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO’s technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that individuals who have COVID-19 with none signs “rarely” transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the assertion simply at some point later.

On June 9, 2020, Dr. Mike Ryan, govt director of WHO’s emergencies program, shortly backpedaled Van Kerkhove’s assertion, saying the remarks had been “misinterpreted or perhaps we did not use essentially the most elegant phrases to clarify that.”20

Widespread asymptomatic spreading is the one motive that lockdowns and masks utilization among the many wholesome make sense. For months, well being officers have been perpetuating the parable of asymptomatic spreading to escalate concern. A landmark examine involving 9,899,828 million residents of Wuhan, China, revealed in Nature Communications,21 discovered not one case of asymptomatic transmission.

Residing in a Topsy-Turvy World

Over the course of current years, and in some circumstances current months, the long-held definitions of pandemics, vaccines and herd immunity have drastically modified to slot in with the brand new narrative being churned out by public well being officers and mainstream media.

In some ways, you are dwelling in a fog of warfare proper now — a fog of COVID war — in keeping with Jeffrey Tucker, editorial director of the American Institute for Financial Analysis (AIER).

Throughout such a fog, “It’s typically unclear who’s making selections and why, and what the relationships are between the methods and the targets. Even the rationale can turn out to be elusive as frustration and disorientation displace readability and rationality.”22 Seeing through the fog is step one to popping out of the battle unscathed.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here